Redirection of the UN

Currently, the deepest widespread enshrinement of monarchy is among Muslim majority nations.   Saudi Arabia's constitution claims to be their Holy Quran (after reading Quran, I don't remember any governmental discussion, so I assume this is symbolic), and the rulers are progeny of Muhammad.   They are the host nation to enshrined pilgrimage cities, so probably can moderate for democracy as an outlier, like Israel, which is the ancestral land of Judaism, birthplace of Christianity, and became valued by Muslims after those origins of previous religions.

Some Muslim nations use Shari's law as the goal of their monarchies, and others truly are hybrid, with Kings supported by elected authorities.   Once I become resigned to the fact that democracy won't be the governance of everyone, I described some of those hybrid governments as commendable, beginning with Iran's about twenty years ago.   More recently I read Jordan's constitution, and found praiseworthy elements.   Unfortunately, I also recently read that Qatar delineates a true monarchy but declares that a 'democracy' which, if true, is insulting.   Another disappointment to me among Islamic nation's constitutions is that many appear almost carbon-copied from one nation to another.

The UN should be promoting understanding between democracies and other forms of government, and point out ridiculous national constitutions, so that nations that said they are "peace-loving" to join, don't just turn around and serve the opposite later.   I'm not dismissing Communism, Socialism, or any other form of government, and I refute Ukraine's resistance in light of U.S. instigations against Russia, but my familiarity is mostly with Democracy, which I promote.

U.S. Influences

The United States, after violating my 1987 warning from God, arranged the 1995 Oslo II, with negotiation of areas A, B, and C in the West Bank, and a five year implementation plan, but they still should take pride in some accomplishments.   To this day, for the most part, Israel and Palestine adhere to the A,B,and C areas, with both sides in obvious violation in certain places.   Israeli courts destroy Jewish settlements and limit construction in the wrong areas unless national security or identity seems at risk.   Talk of a complete handover of our Eastern Parcel was circulated during the process.   In that case, any weak Israelis that might agree with that 'Oslo', might say Palestinian governance wasn't (yet?) established to a level to prevent violence that scuttled the plan.   Despite Oslo II creating a basis for negotiation, the rogue, on the job, off the job US Department of State would love to have us forget that.   Were they attracted to White Horse Beach in heresy, due to Avenue A, B, and C there, while I was also making my Warning, or after?

Here's the second and third line of their STATE.GOV article explaining Oslo, where the time to implementation is given higher priority than negotiation years later, although they warn the series there is no longer maintained:

"... Israel accepted the PLO as the representative of the Palestinians, and the PLO renounced terrorism and recognized Israel’s right to exist in peace.   Both sides agreed that a Palestinian Authority (PA) would be established and assume governing responsibilities in the West Bank and Gaza Strip over a five-year period. ..." here: The Oslo Accords and the Arab-Israeli Peace Process.

They left out a HUGE detail that could potentially revive negotiation.   That A, B, C, thing, where: 'A approximately 18% of the West Bank under PA control, B approximately 22% of the West Bank administered by PA, but security shared with Israel, and C approximately 60% of the West Bank under Israeli control' was established.

Here are three sources from an internet search where I got my numbers, although I disagree with other details or haven't read them further:
Anera.org - What are Area A, Area B, and Area C in the West Bank?
Welcome to Palestine.com - Everything you need to know about Areas A,B and C
Wikipedia.org - West Bank areas in the Oslo II Accord

Palestinians will claim other reasons for the fast breakdown of Oslo II, and now one faction or another probably rejects the PA because of their signing the treaty, but let's not forget the USA at both ends.   When will they return to their leadership as a melting pot of Faiths, and firm silence toward Palestinian crusaders?

Democratic Feel

When America released Kuwait from Iraq, rejecting God's warning I told them starting in 1987, instability began to spread throughout the Middle East.   The current Prophecy I still offer the U.S. is ignored, and I can't achieve the religious 'branch' stage I'm identified with in the Bible, which would improve Israel, although I have started a tiny bit here (translation offered at the Instagram website by clicking on the image):

After I became a citizen of Israel, I never took part in election that occurred while I was there, but I had a very distinct sense the democratic nature of the nation was stronger than my experience in the US.   Israel may have been voting for the formation of a coalition through a single man, but the healthy feeling was tangible to me.   That was before the fast successive elections of the last decade or so, that in my personal experience also felt tangible in democratic depth.   America's weakening of smart politics seems to stem from the rejection of my Prophecy.

International Law Proposals

Laws need to be enacted to prohibit any governing body from creating negative preambles, constitutions, charters, etc. against any other.   This will force them to focus on what they can do for their constituents, and if they happen to be formed in the middle of war or something, their future in governance will already be properly outlined.